Запись архива

The Editorial Draft Audit: 7 Checks Before You Publish

A practical pre-publish audit for WordPress editors: character length, H2 structure, one data table, source trail, and keyword restraint.

Editor running a pre-publish checklist on a WordPress draft
Editor running a pre-publish checklist on a WordPress draft
Journalists Protest against rising violence during march in Mexi | by Knight Foundation | openverse | by-sa

Most WordPress drafts arrive in the same state: a title, a category, maybe an image, and an empty content area. That is not a draft. It is a placeholder. Before it becomes a published post, it needs a quality pass that covers length, structure, sources, and SEO. The checks below are the ones we run on every editorial post we publish, and you can run them in the same order today.

Start with Length, But Measure Characters, Not Words

The quickest quality check is a character count. For a standard news or editorial post, we treat 4,500 characters as the floor and 14,000 as the ceiling for the 2026 editorial year. A post under 4,500 rarely has enough substance to answer a reader’s question; a post over 14,000 usually repeats itself. Copy the body text into a counter and read the number. More importantly, look at where the length comes from. If one section takes 2,000 characters and the rest are thin, expand the thin sections rather than padding the long one. Character count only matters when the length is distributed across the whole article.

Write Five Real Section Headings

Headings are not decoration. Each H2 is a promise that a new piece of information follows. We require a minimum of five H2s in every standard post, and each one must add a fact, comparison, caveat, example, or action. If a heading is followed by a restatement of the intro, delete the heading and move on. Short headings work best: “Start with Length,” “Build the Source Trail,” “Close with a Step.” Readers skim headings to decide whether the post is worth their time, and search engines use them to understand the page.

Add a Table That Helps the Reader Decide

Many editors skip tables because they think tables belong on sales pages. Actually, a 3-5 row table is one of the clearest ways to turn a paragraph of numbers into a decision. Here is the checklist we use internally:

Check Minimum standard What to look for
Content length 4,500-14,000 characters Includes headings, not just paragraph text
H2 headings At least 5 sections Each adds a fact, comparison, or action
Data table 1 table with 3-5 rows Converts numbers or options into a comparison
Keyword usage 2-4 natural mentions Appears in intro, a heading, and a closing action

A table works because it compresses the same material into a scannable format. If your draft has a list of settings, thresholds, or comparisons, that list is probably a table.

Build the Source Trail Before You Write the Last Paragraph

Facts without sources are the fastest way to lose a reader’s trust. Before publishing, name the people, organizations, dates, places, and numbers in your post and decide what is confirmed. If you cite Google’s guidance on helpful content, link to Search Central (https://developers.google.com/search/docs/fundamentals/creating-helpful-content) rather than to a secondhand summary. If a number comes from a company press release, say so. For style questions, the AP Stylebook (https://www.apstylebook.com/) remains the reference we check first. We keep a private fact packet for every post: one line per claim, the source URL next to it, and a note on confidence. Confirmed facts get a link; uncertain ones get a “reported” or “according to” phrase, or they get cut.

Use the Primary Keyword with Intention

Keyword usage is a measurement of restraint. A normal editorial post should use the primary keyword no more than 2-4 times across the body, and never more than 14 times in the entire document. Once per intro and once in a heading is usually enough. The remaining mentions happen naturally inside real sentences. The problem with stuffing is not just the penalty risk; it is the writing. When a keyword appears every third sentence, the prose becomes mechanical. Write the sentence first, then see where the keyword fits. If it does not fit, leave it out.

Read Aloud for Repetition and Robotic Patterns

Repeated paragraphs and generic conclusions are the two most common defects in machine-assisted drafts. After the structure and SEO pass, read the article aloud. If a sentence sounds like a template — “In conclusion, it is important to note” — rewrite it as a direct statement. If two paragraphs say the same thing with different words, cut the second. Concrete verbs and specific names make a post sound human. Instead of “the platform provides a variety of features,” write “WordPress ships with block patterns for tables, quotes, and embeds.” Real details are your best defense against flat writing.

Close with a Decision or a Next Step

Generic closers waste the last paragraph. A strong ending gives the reader a decision or an action. For checklist posts, that means ordering the steps: open the draft, paste the body into a character counter, and confirm the count is between 4,500 and 14,000. Then count the H2s. If there are fewer than five, add sections until each new H2 brings new information. Build or update the fact packet. Insert the table. Run the keyword count. When all of those checks pass, the draft is ready to publish. Do not wait for a perfect draft; publish a well-audited one.